Sweet Revenge against AirNav Systems for stealing my Flight Data

[birdie]

After stealing my Flight Data and banning me from their AirNav Systems Forum, I was really pissed off.

After weeks of Sabre rattling, I decided to do something positive - approach Flightradar24 for one of their Free Flightradar24 Receivers.

My wish was granted and I am now one of the HAPPIEST Feeders in the world for Flightradar24.com.

Then, I PUNISH AirNav Systems - by pulling my BIG SWITCH OFF - to their Flight Data STEALING.

Look at the attached photo to see how miserable Radarbox24.com is on coverage at WSSS !



[Attachment deleted by Admin to save file space]

[kered]

Nice one, its the only way some people will learn, more should do the same.

[viking9]

Those samples are ten hours apart?

[Anmer]

Those samples are ten hours apart?

How do you work that out Tom?

The FR24 time is always UTC and Singapore is 8 hours ahead.

So 04.?? UTC should equate to 12.47 PM Singapore time or thereabouts?  And the aicraft on both screenshots look to be in the same place.

[birdie]

Those samples are ten hours apart?

They are about the same time. When I am home I will check the time settings.

More of AirNav Systems pissed off customers should do what I did.

[Sun Worshipper]

More of AirNav Systems pissed off customers should do what I did.

Hear, hear sir!!

[viking9]

How do you work that out Tom?

The FR24 time is always UTC and Singapore is 8 hours ahead.

So 04.?? UTC should equate to 12.47 PM Singapore time or thereabouts?  And the aicraft on both screenshots look to be in the same place.

I thought they were both on UTC.

[Anmer]

I thought they were both on UTC.

To the best of my recollection they're both "realtime" but only FR24 displays a time.

Last time I looked there was no "clock" on RB24.  Where did you see it?

[birdie]

Those samples are ten hours apart?

No, they are not 10 hrs apart.  Both Flightradar24 and Radarbox24 are UTC.

The time on the right bottom corner is Local time.

On Flightradar24 page, it is UTC.

[birdie]

Those samples are ten hours apart?

No, they are not 10 hrs apart.  Both Flightradar24 and Radarbox24 are UTC.

The time on the right bottom corner is Local time.

On Flightradar24 page, it is UTC.

This attached Picture is GOOD !

RadarBox24 is screaming " WSSS NO SIG " !

It makes my DAY !

More pissed off Customers of AirNav Systems should do what I did.

By the way, when I posted " which is better - Radarbox24 or flightradar24 " - the Admin was a bit polite - calling me " Sir " and then LOCKED the Thread !

Too LATE THIEF - to be polite to me -  a PISSED OFF customer will not accept any polite gestures !



[Attachment deleted by Admin to save file space]

[birdie]

I thought they were both on UTC.

To the best of my recollection they're both "realtime" but only FR24 displays a time.

Last time I looked there was no "clock" on RB24.  Where did you see it?

Hope I am not boring you guys to death. I can't post on AirNav Systems forum -  it will be deleted by their Admin .

Another shot of both tracking websites today.



[Attachment deleted by Admin to save file space]

[viking9]

Last time I looked there was no "clock" on RB24.  Where did you see it?

RB24 is showing the time the last aircraft received which I assume is not far off the time the screenshot was taken.

[Anmer]

RB24 is showing the time the last aircraft received which I assume is not far off the time the screenshot was taken.

Where do you see that Tom?

I have a detailed comparison (to be published) of the three main tracking sites and I couldn't find a time on RB24.

The only timed content I could find was the last "emergency" squawk at the top in the crimson box.

[viking9]

The only timed content I could find was the last "emergency" squawk at the top in the crimson box.

Ah, I was going by the Eemrgency Squawk notice. Having gone to RB24 just now I see it is still displaying that info. My mistake.

[Anmer]

Ah, I was going by the Eemrgency Squawk notice. Having gone to RB24 just now I see it is still displaying that info. My mistake.

Thanks Tom.  I may have missed it and just wanted to check.  Much appreciate your help.