Welcome to Radarspotting. Please login or sign up.

March 28, 2024, 08:58:37 AM

Login with username, password and session length

New Members

New Members

You should get an activation email when you join.  If not, please use the Contact option.

Unique Coverage 2014

Started by birdie, January 18, 2014, 05:40:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

birdie

Today, I had some free time on hand.

So, I took a peep into the Site that proclaimed it has " Unique coverage " .

Surprisingly, it is really " Unique " !





[Attachment deleted by Admin to save file space]
To give "Unique Coverage of WSSS" in www.Radarbox24.com !

birdie

Another "Unique" coverage 15 months later from a site that CLAIMED to have 9 - 15 times MORE receivers than the Competitions.




[Attachment deleted by Admin to save file space]
To give "Unique Coverage of WSSS" in www.Radarbox24.com !

birdie

Today, I have some spare time and nothing important to do.

So, I peep into the Site run by Professional Pilots and claimed to have Unique Coverage.

I was surprised & shocked to see its " Uniqueness " after more than 24 months.



[Attachment deleted by Admin to save file space]
To give "Unique Coverage of WSSS" in www.Radarbox24.com !

Keef

Another insightful and informative post, NOT.

Please give it a rest, you bore us all.

We all know, we've all known for ages, please stop wasting both your time and ours.

Just stop, life is too short.

Anmer

Quote from: Keef on September 06, 2016, 12:42:55 AM
Please give it a rest, you bore us all.

Not true, I find some of Birdie's posts quite interesting and amusing.

Some may be repetitive but he's posting within the forum rules.  ;)


Here to Help.

Truetrack

Whenever I have a look into this category now and then
it is amazing how much effort this poster spends to express his animosity.

Myself I find it not only disappointing but meanwhile a nuisance.
Klaus

Anmer

Quote from: Truetrack on September 06, 2016, 10:20:13 AM
Myself I find it not only disappointing but meanwhile a nuisance.

This is a forum and not everyone will agree with everyone else.

But as long as no rules are broken, Birdie, and others, are free to post.  No one is obliged to read all posts.

Here to Help.

corsa


If you look to see who sent the post and are aware of the posters views, then surely you don't need to read it  !!!!

Keef

Maybe I don't need to read it, but maybe I like to read what is being posted in case it is of interest to me?
Clearly this is almost never the case for me with posts from one member, but maybe one day I would miss out if I never read his posts.

Interesting point about forum rules though.

An avatar of a used cat's litter tray and a signature referring to pee and poo. Not exactly nice. I'd probably ask for those to be changed if I were a mod.
Accusation of someone (we all know he's referring to) being a thief. I'd probably ask for that to be changed too.

The rules exclude "false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing" comments.

I'd say the thief bit was several of the above and the image and parts of the signature fall foul of vulgar clause.

I don't want to get in to an argument over the rules so I will state that the above is just my opinion and not a criticism of the way the forum is run.
I might do it differently, but I'm not doing it and I respect those who give up their time, knowledge and effort to provide the forum to us all.

All the best,

Keef.


Anmer

Quote from: Keef on September 08, 2016, 08:56:23 PM
The rules exclude "false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing" comments.

I don't see anything in Birdie's post that includes any of the above.

And if anyone thinks otherwise, I have ample (personal) evidence to support his views about "the thief".  I also have a cat's litter tray which I view as a necessity.  ;)
Here to Help.

Keef