Radarspotting

Mode-S Software => RadarBox => Topic started by: birdie on January 18, 2014, 05:40:18 AM

Title: Unique Coverage 2014
Post by: birdie on January 18, 2014, 05:40:18 AM
Today, I had some free time on hand.

So, I took a peep into the Site that proclaimed it has " Unique coverage " .

Surprisingly, it is really " Unique " !



Title: Re: Unique Coverage 2014
Post by: birdie on March 16, 2015, 04:02:14 AM
Another "Unique" coverage 15 months later from a site that CLAIMED to have 9 - 15 times MORE receivers than the Competitions.


Title: Re: Unique Coverage 2014
Post by: birdie on September 05, 2016, 03:09:22 AM
Today, I have some spare time and nothing important to do.

So, I peep into the Site run by Professional Pilots and claimed to have Unique Coverage.

I was surprised & shocked to see its " Uniqueness " after more than 24 months.

 
Title: Re: Unique Coverage 2014
Post by: Keef on September 06, 2016, 12:42:55 AM
Another insightful and informative post, NOT.

Please give it a rest, you bore us all.

We all know, we've all known for ages, please stop wasting both your time and ours.

Just stop, life is too short.
Title: Re: Unique Coverage 2014
Post by: Anmer on September 06, 2016, 07:44:51 AM
Please give it a rest, you bore us all.

Not true, I find some of Birdie's posts quite interesting and amusing.

Some may be repetitive but he's posting within the forum rules.  ;)


Title: Re: Unique Coverage 2014
Post by: Truetrack on September 06, 2016, 10:20:13 AM
Whenever I have a look into this category now and then
it is amazing how much effort this poster spends to express his animosity.

Myself I find it not only disappointing but meanwhile a nuisance.
Title: Re: Unique Coverage 2014
Post by: Anmer on September 06, 2016, 12:02:03 PM
Myself I find it not only disappointing but meanwhile a nuisance.

This is a forum and not everyone will agree with everyone else.

But as long as no rules are broken, Birdie, and others, are free to post.  No one is obliged to read all posts.

Title: Re: Unique Coverage 2014
Post by: corsa on September 07, 2016, 08:59:26 AM

 If you look to see who sent the post and are aware of the posters views, then surely you don't need to read it  !!!!
Title: Re: Unique Coverage 2014
Post by: Keef on September 08, 2016, 08:56:23 PM
Maybe I don't need to read it, but maybe I like to read what is being posted in case it is of interest to me?
Clearly this is almost never the case for me with posts from one member, but maybe one day I would miss out if I never read his posts.

Interesting point about forum rules though.

An avatar of a used cat's litter tray and a signature referring to pee and poo. Not exactly nice. I'd probably ask for those to be changed if I were a mod.
Accusation of someone (we all know he's referring to) being a thief. I'd probably ask for that to be changed too.

The rules exclude "false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing" comments.

I'd say the thief bit was several of the above and the image and parts of the signature fall foul of vulgar clause.

I don't want to get in to an argument over the rules so I will state that the above is just my opinion and not a criticism of the way the forum is run.
I might do it differently, but I'm not doing it and I respect those who give up their time, knowledge and effort to provide the forum to us all.

All the best,

Keef.

Title: Re: Unique Coverage 2014
Post by: Anmer on September 08, 2016, 10:19:56 PM
The rules exclude "false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing" comments.

I don't see anything in Birdie's post that includes any of the above.

And if anyone thinks otherwise, I have ample (personal) evidence to support his views about "the thief".  I also have a cat's litter tray which I view as a necessity.  ;)
Title: Re: Unique Coverage 2014
Post by: Keef on September 09, 2016, 12:02:29 AM
Cheers all.

 :)