New Members

New Members

You should get an activation email when you join.  If not, please use the Contact option.
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 11, 2021, 08:42:27 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 53737
  • Total Topics: 13016
  • Online Today: 59
  • Online Ever: 97
  • (March 21, 2021, 08:40:17 AM)
Users Online

Donations

Donations help with annual costs and keep Radarspotting free of advertising. Thank you.

Latest Post

Latest File

Silhouettes, Profiles and Operator Logos

If you're looking for a bulk download, we have over 66,000 aircraft silhouettes, profiles and operator logos available in bmp file format, 85x20 pixels. You can find all the Zip files here.  

For help installing these files, there's a free Guide here

Some of the Latest Additions:









Author Topic: 7C1673  (Read 124 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline flyoverfred

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
7C1673
« on: November 03, 2020, 04:18:26 AM »
PA31 N628HA is somehow pinging the above OZ code (VH-EPX) when it should be A834A5 !! It has no Australian history so no real explanation !

Offline s92driver

  • Top Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1560
Re: 7C1673
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2020, 07:58:15 AM »
Perhaps it's been fitted with a Transponder that was once in VH-EPX and the technician didn't change the DIP switches.  Once intalled, it's generally not possible to change the code without removing it again.

Offline flyoverfred

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: 7C1673
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2020, 04:03:58 PM »
Perhaps it's been fitted with a Transponder that was once in VH-EPX and the technician didn't change the DIP switches.  Once intalled, it's generally not possible to change the code without removing it again.

I don't know of they are a standard fit but VH-EPX was a helicopter and the other is a PA31

Offline Ospreyv22

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
Re: 7C1673
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2020, 07:47:03 PM »
Interestingly enough, but 71C673 should be on a P68C c/n 513/c VH-EPX with the Reg being used the 3rd time around,
Don't know if that's added to any confusion over the Hex Code or helped.

Regards

Ian

Offline IanH

  • Top Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
Re: 7C1673
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2020, 08:22:16 PM »
Looking at the two hexcodes in binary format, there does not seem to be any overlap.

Other miscodes are usually just a 0/1 interchanged (perhaps a couple of times).

The differences between these two would have to be a random setting of the switches to give the wrong hexcode.

Simplest to believe a box moved to another aircraft.