Welcome to Radarspotting. Please login or sign up.

June 15, 2026, 09:07:27 PM

Login with username, password and session length

New Members

New Members

You should get an activation email when you join.  If not, please use the Contact option.

The Work Starts Now on RadarBox Updates

Started by Anmer, February 01, 2012, 09:58:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

tarbat

Quote from: mhm on April 24, 2012, 05:41:49 PMTo be a proper scot  Tarbat. You have to wear a Kilt. I cannot ever see you wearing one.

Welcome

You obviously weren't at my son's wedding last year!!  Although a kilt is something I've never felt the urge to wear!!

Hamish McTorsk

QuoteTARBAT: I consider myself Scottish now

Alex Salmond and the Pàrtaidh Nàiseanta na h-Alba should beware of fifth columnist's.

Sun Worshipper

Quote from: Sun Worshipper on February 01, 2012, 11:17:51 AM
Better late than never I suppose.

I hope Air Nav honour their promises to restart development work on the Radarbox.

Getting back to the original topic, I have seen precious little development since ShipTrax has been launched.  Was all the bravado and bluster a lie to buy more time, once :-\ again?

Anmer

To be fair we don't know what work is going on behind the scenes.  We could be in for a big surprise.

But I suspect the email alert and trojan issues have been a distraction though ShipTrax bugs seem non-existent.  But so too are customers.  ;)

Personally I'm not convinced AirNav has the development resources for a new RadarBox software release or a new receiver that can handle Mlat and compete with the SBS-3.  But this is just my personal view.
Here to Help.

tarbat

#19
Quote from: Hamish McTorsk on April 27, 2012, 08:08:01 AM
QuoteTARBAT: I consider myself Scottish now

Alex Salmond and the Pàrtaidh Nàiseanta na h-Alba should beware of fifth columnist's.

Is that really necessary :(

Quote from: Anmer on April 27, 2012, 09:33:33 AMPersonally I'm not convinced AirNav has the development resources for a new RadarBox software release or a new receiver that can handle Mlat and compete with the SBS-3.  But this is just my personal view.

Perhaps they outsource some aspects of development.  That's what they did with ShipTrax hardware and firmware.

Hamish McTorsk

Quote from: tarbat on April 27, 2012, 05:25:21 PM
Is that really necessary :(

Considering your past activities on my old forum I think that the use of ' fifth columnist',  is fair and appropriate.

tarbat

Quote from: Hamish McTorsk on April 27, 2012, 05:39:28 PM
Quote from: tarbat on April 27, 2012, 05:25:21 PM
Is that really necessary :(

Considering your past activities on my old forum I think that the use of ' fifth columnist',  is fair and appropriate.

And I so hoped we'd got beyond name calling - sad.

Anmer

Quote from: tarbat on April 27, 2012, 05:52:05 PM
And I so hoped we'd got beyond name calling - sad.

I hardly think that was "name calling".  More of an observation.  :D
Here to Help.

Hamish McTorsk

Ah well, if that's how you see it..............................

Anmer

Quote from: tarbat on April 27, 2012, 05:25:21 PM
Perhaps they outsource some aspects of development.  That's what they did with ShipTrax hardware and firmware.

And delivered it three years late.  :-\
Here to Help.

Anmer

Quote from: Hamish McTorsk on April 27, 2012, 06:00:02 PM
Ah well, if that's how you see it..............................

OK, let's keep this civilised and stick with the topic please.
Here to Help.